Or, have some money and know that some people think you are a complete and total jerk with no regard for their personal feelings whatsoever?
It’s just a thought exercise. You may not reject the premise that it’s either/or. Just pick one
To keep in touch, generate conversation (and a hint of controversy), and opine.
One of the concepts I want my kids to have is that to be an effective marketer, you need to understand how much value the customer places on a transaction.
It’s not about your cost or your time.
So, the other night, when they were telling me about the “show” they were putting on, they said, “tickets costs 30 cents.”
So, I asked them, “how do I know it’s worth 30 cents? I’ve never seen the show. None of my friends have either.”
So, they agreed to put some “skin in the game” and we agreed on a two-tier pricing model.
I would buy a ticket for 15 cents. Then, after the show, I could pay as much as I wanted…up to 45 cents.
Which they earned
Well, it is still early in the process and it IS winter (full of cloudy days and some snow), but it IS working and, in my mind, that’s
Below is a recent daily chart showing solar energy production.
If you are interested, here's the link to get an estimate.
(full disclosure...if you do sign up via this link, we both get some $).
let's just get out of the way that I am a huge Lewis fan and this one did not disappoint. I Finally (i think!) understand what a CDO is and what a credit default swap is, though I am not 100% certain I could explain it.
Anyway, what really astounds me is our continual ability to forget that corporations are nothing more than aggregations of people. Just because you work at Morgan Stanley doesn't necessarily mean that you are smarter than everyone else....in fact, often times, it is a liability, as you tend to trust others, thinking they are smarter than average.
If Michael Moore's documentaryCapitalism: A Love Story
Is on ine side of the spectrum and Too Big is on the other, the Big Short is the goldilocks option.
As Ace pointed out, "I am not an anti-Wall St guy, per SE, but it is wrong that places like Goldman Sachs got 100% of the money owed to them at taxpayer expense."
I think the other thing that was so astounding was how everyone was so guilty....not just the consumers who were either stupid or victims or both but also everyone along the way in the lending business...right up to Greenspan.
reading books like this will help us,i hope, not repeat the mistakes of he past. If we do, as a society, at least we will hopefully be on the other side of the bet.
When I was in Brazil, Neal told me about a great episode of “This American Life” where they talk about the invention and fiction of money.
The first example was how Brazil stopped their horrific inflation rate using a “trick.”
I bought it and really enjoyed it.
Met a guy the other day who paid off $52,000 worth of debt in 8 months. So inspiring.
I loved his passion for helping others. It’s worth the watch and/or sharing his contact information with someone who might need the help.
it’s a cinch.
I despise doing taxes.
I’d honestly rather clean up my kids projectile vomiting from the floor than prepare them.
In the past, I’ve said, “Ok, I really hate this job, so I’m just going to do it in a marathon session so I can just get this out the door.”
What happens is that I spend 4 hours doing something I can’t stand and, what’s more, there’s always some information that I don’t have and thus can’t complete it.
This year, I took a different tack. Perhaps because I felt like I couldn’t devote a marathon session to it.
I just said, “ok, I’m going to do an hour every other night for 2 weeks [deadline] and then I’ll be done.”
What happened?
I got it done, still hated it, but the stress level was much lower. It was manageable (or at least more so).
A mental trick perhaps, but for me, it worked.
I have been waiting for this for a LONG time.
Now, you can just say “I trust the financial investments of so-and-so” and you automatically make the investments they make.
It’s your money and you hold onto it, but you let them make the decisions.
I’m going to do this.
Image by Getty Images via Daylife
The NFO rightly felt that redeeming bonus points for lost privileges sent the wrong message, i.e. If you have enough ‘money,’ you can buy yourself out of punishments.
So, the system has been modified and updated.
There is a base level of expected behavior that I have for each of my kids.
If the child goes “above and beyond” the call of duty (entirely subjective) by me, I will award a number of bonus points (between 1 and 5).
If the child behaves in an inappropriate manner, the child is “fined” and loses bonus points, again determined by me.
Each child keeps track of his running tally.
Now, here’s the beauty of the system.
Bonus points are not redeemed for prizes, rather they are the means through which sibling disagreements are resolved.
For example, Tonka and Paco were both playing with the paints. They both decided…at the same time, of course, that they wanted the pink colored paint.
Instead of serving as the negotiator between the two of them, I simply let the market decide by establishing an auction.
Each child may bid up to his/her maximum number of bonus points (which will be deducted, of course) for the right to the disputed item.
The best part…and the key lesson here…is that I want my kids to understand that at a certain point, even if they have the money and can afford it, they should know that it is just not worth it to do so.
In the case of the paint, Tonka had 47 bonus points and Paco had 21 (they accumulate at the same rate, but Paco is fined more often).
I instructed them to begin the bidding at 1 (since we’d never want to overpay, would we?)
Well, at 9 bonus points, Paco decided that it wasn’t worth it to spend 10, so he let Tonka have it.
She then had 38 bonus points and Paco still had 21.
Peaceful resolution.
And, it’s worked two other times as well.
It’s far from scientific, since there are times where, after a series of fines, I might be inclined to award a higher than average number of points to Paco to balance his self-esteem or to “age adjust” and award Tonka fewer than I would Paco for the same type of “above and beyond behavior” (e.g. “the playroom looks messy, I will clean it up”), but so far it seems to be working.
Image by Getty Images via Daylife
Image by Getty Images via Daylifeto flush the toilet water...
Image via Wikipedia I'd heard horror stories of the *great business practice* of the RIAA suing their customers, but it had never hit home...until last week.
Image by kevindooley via Flickr
The winning “World’s Best Presentations” kawasaki presentation was entitled
It’s a powerful statement of how safe drinking water is become increasingly scarce.
I saw it and thought “ok, what can I do?”
Then, I was reminded of a review I saw in Popular Mechanics about a grey-water toilet system called Aqus (it takes the water you use in your sink and repurposes it for your toilet)
I thought “great, I’ll get one.”
Then, I saw the price tag $279, which is $10 more than I spent on water for my whole house for the first 7 months of the year.
It’s hard to think that a system on one toilet is going to reduce water costs by 50%. It’s not.
So, the question becomes: how much is saving water for others worth it to me?
Crass, but true.
On the other hand, if the price of water goes up (like oil/gas), well, at some point, it’s worth it.
The free market strikes again..
One of the things about home maintenance and management is that this adage proves true time and time again.
Just flushed the water heater (recommended once a year).